Out of this World // Movie Review of INTERSTELLAR

This has been the fall and winter of movies and I have yet to be disappointed. Starting off with David Fincher’s Gone Girl (which I wrote a review about here), to Dan Gilroy’s directional debut with Nightcrawler (which I’m going to write a review on later), to Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar (which is today’s review), I knew that these trips to the movies these past couple months were going to be intense. And I have been far from disappointed.

The Pros

To me, Interstellar was everything it promised to be. Mind-blowing. Out of this world, if you don’t mind puns.

I’ve only recently become more interested in the sci-fi genre, so I tend to go into these movies mostly unaware of what to expect or how things will be portrayed. Leading up to seeing the movie, I had been constantly hearing about how thoroughly researched the film was. This was a huge plus to me because it almost took away the “fiction” feel of the film’s ideas, letting me as a viewer fully embrace the plot not just in a moment of suspension of disbelief, but because the actual science presented allowed it.

While a fairly basic, and probably unfair choice, the only movie I can roughly compare Interstellar to is Gravity. Both are huge space epics, but there are definitely distinct differences to the two. While the visual eye candy of Gravity is extremely hard to challenge, Interstellar moved me in a way that I didn’t experience with Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity. You’re able to actually connect to the characters and feel for them. Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway played their characters brilliantly and their characterization helped connect them to the audience. I also confess that I did cry a couple times during the movie.

As soon as the credits rolled and Hans Zimmer’s name came up, a friend and I both threw our hands up as a sort of “of course he composed the music!” reaction. Zimmer, who composed movies such as Pirates of the Caribbean, the Dark Knight trilogy, Inception, and 12 Years a Slave, yet again created a masterpiece. The music was unbelievable, helping elevate the journey.

It’s also just a generally beautiful film as well. Specifically in the first third of the film on Earth, the lighting and dramatic scenes are beautiful to watch. Though the space scenes are the majority of the film, and they are spectacular as well, Nolan doesn’t take that as a cue to let the Earth scenes be lackluster. Early scenes involving the dust storms take your breath away, while even just a shot of McConaughey looking out a window is dramatically lit as we have a silent moment with his character. The expansive setting of farm fields helps play with the figurative idea of space, paralleled by the eventual literal space that the rest of the movie spends its time in. While dealing with outer space and planets, there is a sense of intimacy when it comes to the filming of the characters. Except for when emphasizing something happening in the location around them, shots focusing on the actors are tight and personal. The people of the story are just as integral as the vast worlds around them and we never lose sight of that.

The Cons

Interstellar clocks in at almost three hours, which is hardly an usual length for a movie these days so it isn’t typically a con. However there’s something about this movie that makes it feel even longer–try four to five hours. In a seemingly fitting way in regards to the plot, you lose track of time while you’re watching the movie. While I wasn’t particularly bothered by the length, I was definitely aware of how long the movie felt, versus how some movies can be extremely long (Wolf of Wall Street and Pulp Fiction for example) and not feel nearly as long. To me, it’s important to be able to lose myself in the movie and not be aware of external factors, such as how long I’ve been in the theater.

While it was listed in my “pros” section, there’s also a big of a con to me involving the science in the film. And that’s because of exactly that — the science. This movie delves into a type of science that is so difficult to understand that really my best advice is to almost tune out what they’re saying and accept it. While the amount of science researched was immense and helps demonstrate a realistic story, it can be overwhelming at times. At one point near the end, there is also a switch where suddenly the science goes from “okay I think I get it” to “this makes no sense at all,” and to me that’s dangerous. To build up an entire movie on the actuality of science works until suddenly it’s all theoretical is very difficult to keep up, and somewhat of a let down. This is a minor issue, but does cause some confusion and might be the movie’s biggest struggle. Sometimes you have to explain everything or nothing, not just most of it.

The Conclusion

Even if science isn’t exactly your thing, or if it is, I absolutely recommend seeing Interstellar. And if possible, make sure that you see it in theaters in order to maximize your experience. Some movies are fine no matter what format you watch them in, but this is a movie that is meant for the biggest screen possible. Maybe it’s not my favorite film, and that’s okay. It was amazing to watch and to see the story unfold. When the movie ended, the entire theater just sat for a minute as everything sunk in. This movie is truly an experience to be had. If you haven’t seen the trailer, make sure to check it out and the next time you have an evening (and you’ll need all of that evening), maybe grab some tickets and check out Nolan’s new space epic for yourself!

Advertisements

Gone Crazy for Gone Girl || Movie Review

I’ve been eagerly waiting for Gone Girl to hit theaters and was able to get to see it yesterday and now that I’ve had a night to sleep on all of the thoughts whirling around in my head, I’m finally able to sit down and begin to write my review of the film. I will do my absolute best to remain spoiler free because I’m adamant that if there’s ever a movie to NOT be spoiled, it’s this roller coaster of a story.

It’s been about two to three years since I first read Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl. My mom had originally read it for her book club and told me that it was a must read for me as well. And wow, was she right. I was blown away by the book and I also nearly threw it across the room when I was done (book readers and movie goers will know why). So when I heard about it being made into a movie, I was both excited and nervous. The only thing that eased my trepidation was finding out that Flynn wrote the screenplay and I allowed myself to get caught up in the excitement.

I was not disappointed in the slightest.

Right from the opening clip, David Fincher’s Gone Girl pulls you right into the story. While you do feel aware the length of the movie (clocking in at 149 minutes), you never once feel like you’re losing interest or that it’s dragging. The twists and turns keep you riveted on the action on screen. If you’ve read the book, it’s amazing the great transitions that Flynn was able to make in transposing the story for the film. It’s told in an extremely similar fashion to the story-telling of the book, which I wasn’t sure at first they would be able to pull off.

I was also blown away by the performances of lead actors Ben Affleck and Rosamund Pike. It might be one of the most perfect castings I have ever seen for a film, and it’s impossible to imagine any other choice. They truly were able to embody their characters in a chilling, yet perfect way. Affleck nails his role as Nick Dunne, the husband who has to deal with the disappearance with his wife while dealing with figuring out what happened and dealing with a police force and town that is questioning his innocence. Affleck is able to transition through the different faces of his character, giving a depth to Nick that is both subtle and explosive at the same time. In a fantastic combination of the writing and his acting, Affleck creates a character that you’re both drawn to and repulsed by. And having only seen Pike in the 2005 remake of Pride and Prejudice, I was beyond floored by her portrayal of the beautiful, yet cold, Amy Dunne. To avoid spoilers I won’t talk much about her role or character, but if she doesn’t received an Oscar nomination I will be severely disappointed. These two roles are both extremes in every aspect and these two actors were able to capture them in such a raw form that it’s almost as if it was originally written for them.

As a cinema student and a sucker for anything aesthetically pleasing, it’s impossible for me to avoid talking about how beautifully the film was made. Fincher, as usual, nailed it. This isn’t just a dark story, this is a dark film. There is no warmth in color or in feeling, and instead we get a glimpse into their characters’ lives just when things are at their worst. Much like Se7en, there’s a detached and sort of cold feeling to the way it is shot. While I haven’t seen as much of his work as I want to, I’ve been lucky enough to be able to listen to and analyze his work in different cinema classes. There are intimate shots of usual objects, and he often just lets the action unfold in front of a stationary camera, not letting us get distracted and instead focusing purely on what’s going on. We are however given a complete vision of what it is that we need to see.

The score for the film adds a lot to it as well. Even though it isn’t a “scary movie” or a movie that has any type of jump scares, the music helps keep you on the edge of your seat. There’s a tension that seems to consistently build, never letting us forget that something bigger is going on.

Overall I couldn’t get over how well made the movie was. It was hands down one of the best adaptations I have ever seen, while also being one of the best new movies that I have seen in a while. Now that I’ve seen it, I find myself itching to reread the book and I can almost guarantee that I will see the movie in theaters again. And if that’s not the mark of success then I don’t know what is.